Now PSA Screening is the hottest topic in the world, everyone talk about this. Just look for the video:
A paper published earlier today in Cancer has made a very reasonable attempt to estimate how many men would be being diagnosed annually today with metastatic (TxNxM1) prostate cancer if there was no PSA test and the rates of diagnosis were the same as they were back in the late 1980s — before PSA testing … .
Using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to screen for prostate cancer has remained controversial among some patients. Now a new study says more men could possibly develop advanced cases of cancer if doctors did away with the blood test.and#13;.
(Time.com) — If you’re wondering because experts still can’t determine on prostate-cancer screening, you’re not alone. Just dual months ago, a vital U.S. supervision row pronounced that basically no one should get screened for prostate cancer, claiming a elementary blood exam for prostate-specific antigen, or PSA, does some-more mistreat than good. Now, a new investigate … .
By Steven ReinbergHealthDay ReporterMONDAY, July 30 (HealthDay News) — In the wake of a widely publicized report advising against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer, a new study finds not screening would triple the number of U.S. men developing advanced cancer. Testing, on the other hand, might keep some 17,000 men each year … .
A recent study published in WebMD looks at the results of PSA screening and finds that the PSA test has significant reduced the number of men who are diagnosed each year with advanced prostate cancer, the kind that generally kills … Continue reading .